15 million EUR rental fees for a 10 goals attacker.
Unfortunately, it’s weak when that’s all Bayern has found.
But you prefer to tact on Woltemade for 2 months instead of recording the « no » and immediately identifying other options.
It cost Chelsea 37 million euros and Bayern brought back almost half of them for a one year loan. Well for Chelsea that there is always someone who pays his mistakes.
Well, what do you want to do? Unfortunately, you have a very bad negotiation position (again) and each club knows that you have urgently strengthened.
Of course, 15 million rental costs are not optimal, but with a flexible usable player (who could have covered several positions) and a currently difficult and crazy market, it was the compromise to avoid the obligation to buy.
I am sure that Bayern would not have drawn the purchase option of 65 million next summer, but these are Premier League prices.
Eberl can only really be sorry for you, because on the one hand, reinforcements are necessary to save the club’s objectives and also its own work and on the other hand, it is prohibited to shop and borrow, then listening. #Honessade
But he has certainly been known for four months that you have no one left behind Kane. And the result is that you want to make this expensive loan 2 days before the objective?
I would call it failure. For 2 months, they stiffen on Woltemade and did not want to admit that Stuttgart means what he says. Time in which you still had a selection.
It has been introduced into the situation that you could only draw in a very lean selection and that you must submit to a price dictation.
Scary transfer windows from Bavaria because I also consider that Diaz is completely paid.
You were only occupied on the delivery page. The obligations were made. It seems everywhere and never wanted to do something with the attached intention, so that the players preferred to go elsewhere. But Eberl smiles in the camera and is full of conviction to have it well.
The coach’s search was an identical tragedy.
You just give up a very bad image.
You always draw from the fact that you had a strong team and that the basic structure is strong. If you plan the team for a few years, the Bundesliga will be exciting again.
The strikers’ market is extremely difficult, everyone knows that Bavaria has to pay. Consequently, you are automatically in a bad negotiation position. Of course, the construction site behind Kane had been known for a long time, but which should be realistic? A player with the necessary quality which 90% is on the bench behind Kane, or someone like Woltemade, who can also play next or simply instead of Kane.
In addition, there was an attempt to obtain future pillars of the national team with Wirtz or Woltemade, which is the claim of FC Bayern.
You poker and played. The poker around Woltemade dragged for a very long time, but if you had closed the position in the past, the criticism would probably have been the same, only then « too early ” and that you are installed with the next German international, which then goes abroad and can no longer be reached.
In the end, you must weigh and I think the Bavarians underestimated the speed with which a « player wants to go to FC Bayern » if the money calls from England.
The location is certainly not optimal, but in my opinion, not this « failure » that you make of it. The external impact is bad, but I see the main debt more in Hoeneß than with Eberl – one hand does something different from the other. « »